![]() It needs to create a temporary file for each of the VBR files or it doesn't seem to play them right. VBR files seem to need to be handled differently in some cases. Not that I have 500 albums but just trying to get an idea of the space savings :pġ. And the quality should still be as good as a 320kbps file because it goes up to that as necessary. So if I had 500 copies of that album and did it in VBR HIGH I would save about 3.3GB vs. I was bored so I made a small spreadsheet. Here is the space savings for VBR if I had 100 or 500 copies of that particular album. or at least as far as I know.Īltmanjc wrote:I ripped an entire album into all three formats. I suppose there could be such issues, MP3 isn't relaly tuned to a specific type of music or dynamic range really. *rarely* do I notice any MP3 artifacting. Honestly I haven't noticed that, but again I always do mine at the highest rate. ![]() Those squeals and howls of bad MP3s seem to come up much more often when encoding vintage stuff as opposed to modern stuff (not limited to jazz and blues-any modern stuff). I could encode many at a max bitrate of 256 or something, but i doubt it'd make much difference on size for vintage music.Īnother question: although it it seems like encoding a high-quality recording loses less sound quality, I have actually found the opposite: that the worse the original recording, the less room there is to play with. ![]() I pretty much error on the side of quality. Even though I use VBR High (in other words a max of 320), most of my files probably never even touch the max bitrate. GemZombie wrote:With Older tunes, the dynamic range is very limited, thus full bitrate isn't necessary to compress all the sound available.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |